The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates the length of conversations made via 3 types of phone calls throughout the UK between 1995 and 2002.
Overall, while the amount of time spent on mobiles (all calls) and national and international-fixed line witnessed a significant increase over the period shown, the opposite was true for the local fixed line. However, the amount of time on local fixed line was by far the highest, followed in turn by national and international fixed line and mobiles (all calls).
To begin with, the length of conversations through local-fixed line showed an upward trend from 72 billion minutes in 1995, reaching its peak at 90 billion in 1999. Over the next 4 years, it experienced a considerable decline and turned back to its first amount in 2002.
National and international-fixed line’s duration of conversations observed a steady growth throughout these seven years, from around 37 billion minutes to 60 billion.
The amount of time spent on mobiles (all calls) was almost 2 billion minutes at first. Since then, it rose gradually and finally reached 45 billion minutes in 2002.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, then, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09392265193 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05088455769 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574585635359 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4409516269 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.036517073307 0.215688989381 17% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0191543641277 0.103423049105 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0185520450252 0.0843802449381 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0238933007982 0.15604864568 15% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187930335208 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.