The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013.
The bar chart illustrates changes in worldwide sales of the five largest mobile phone manufacturers from 2009 to 2013.
Evidently, over the 4-year period, Samsung supplanted Nokia to become the leading company in the global mobile phone market. During the same period, Apple enjoyed a surge in its handset sales, climbing rapidly to the third place.
Dominating the mobile phone world in 2009 with roughly 440 million units sold, Nokia suffered a dramatic plunge in sales during the following four years. The number of products sold by the Finnish company shrank to only 250 million in 2013, while the sales of Samsung, in stark contrast, increased markedly. With sales reaching 450 million handsets, the Korean manufacturer officially overtook Nokia as the best-selling brand in 2013.
It is also noteworthy that in the meantime, the gaps between Apple and the above-mentioned tech giants were rapidly narrowed since Apple’s sales showed an impressive growth. Starting from only 20 million devices sold in 2009 – the lowest number among the five companies, the sales of Apple skyrocketed to 150 millions, surpassing both LG and ZTE in 2013. In contrast, LG and ZTE encountered an unsuccessful period when their sales either dropped considerably or remained stagnant.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35643564356 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74689583383 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628712871287 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.824191931 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.222222222 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3179818301 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120572139034 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937716823811 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192895246444 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0988300276946 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.