The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparis

The chart below depicts the alteration in house prices during twelve years from 1990 to 2002 in five different cities throughout the globe in comparison with 1989.

It is distinctively transparent that some cities underwent decrease in house prices between 1990 and 1995. The average house values decline in both London and Tokyo by 7 percent, and also New York had a drop by 5 percent. Conversely, from 1990 to 1995 cities like Madrid and Frankfort experience a growth in average house prices respectively by approximately 2 and 3 percent.

When it comes to period between 1996 and 2002 the inflation is a distinctive phenomenon in comparison with 1989. Hence, Tokyo had a dramatic rise in average house values by almost 12 percent, while other cities like New York, Madrid and Frank Fort similarly resemble a small scale rise in prices respectively by 5, 4 and 2 percent. Finally, Tokyo again repeated almost similar trend during 1996 to 2002 by 5 percent decrease in house prices.

To sum up, it is somehow manifest that the average house values have followed an upward trend between 1996 and 2002 when we compare with 1989. Of course, it is a natural incident by global boom in the population.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, hence, if, similarly, so, while, of course, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89756097561 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66963447781 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531707317073 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5456608934 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.555555556 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340364832108 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147684730443 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908784836508 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226833216994 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646567797451 0.0819641961636 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.