The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rate between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The first bar chart illustrates the number of marriages and divorces in the USA during the period of 1970 and 2000. The second bar chart compares adult Americans's marital status between these two years.
First of all, the proportion of marriages in America had a drop from 1970 to 2000 whereas the rate of divorces fluctuated. According to comparison between 1970 and 2000, there was a slightly increase in the percentage of adults who never married or divorced. In constrast, the number of married and widowed adult Americans had a slightly drop.
In 1970, there were 2.5 million marriages in the USA. This rate remain stably in 1980 before falling down by 0.5 million in the year 2000. During 1970 and 2000, the number of divorces fluctuated. First, it was only 1 million then reached a peak at nearly 1.5 million in 1980. At last, it came to 1 million again in 2000.
From the second bar chart, we can see precise details about marriage status of adult Americans. Less and less people get married. More than 10% decrease in the percentage of married adults in 30 years from 1970 to 2000. In contrast, more and more people get divorced. A very small amount of divorced people could be found in 1970 but in 2000 it increased roughly by 3 times. Following this trend, the proportion of never married adults rose quickly through 30 years while there was a negligible change in the percentage of widowed adults.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...arison between 1970 and 2000, there was a slightly increase in the percentage of adults who never m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('drop') instead of another adjective.
...married and widowed adult Americans had a slightly drop. In 1970, there were 2.5 million mar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...age status of adult Americans. Less and less people get married. More than 10% decre...
^^^^
Line 7, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...1970 but in 2000 it increased roughly by 3 times. Following this trend, the propo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, then, whereas, while, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74493927126 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44139961239 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51012145749 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5705799778 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.25 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4375 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4375 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27085863612 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954764550798 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714495417881 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182190117906 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749061943586 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.