The bar charts below illustrate data regarding the difference between the number of the marriage and divorces from 1970 to 2000 and also the condition of adults in the USA in the year 1970 and 2000.
According to the first chart, it is manifest that the number of marriages was at its peak during two year (1970 and 1980) and had a steady rate. On the other hand, it pursued a downward trend from 1980 onward and stood on 2 million in 2000.
When it comes to divorces, the number of divorces was the same during three years (1970, 1990 and 2000) by 1 millions except 1980 that solely accounted for near 1.5 million.
The second bar charts distinctively manifest that the proportion of married adults were the dominated status of the Americans community during 1970 and 2000 by 70 and almost 60 percent. widowed adults slightly dropped from 1970 ( 8 percent) to 2000 ( 7 percent, while the level of divorced ones doubled approximately the same years and from 1 percentage reached to almost 10 percent. Interestingly enough, those who were not fond of marriage had an insignificant growth and demonstrated 20 percent near two times of divorces rate.
To sum up, it is noticeable that during these three decades marriages were immensely prevalent among USA adults compared to divorces. Not only was the percentage of adults in 1970 so high, the rate of it was proportionally significant in the 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Widowed
...0 and 2000 by 70 and almost 60 percent. widowed adults slightly dropped from 1970 8 pe...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...idowed adults slightly dropped from 1970 8 percent to 2000 7 percent, while the ...
^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tly dropped from 1970 8 percent to 2000 7 percent, while the level of divorced o...
^^
Line 7, column 288, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... 7 percent, while the level of divorced ones doubled approximately the same years an...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, regarding, second, so, while, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1161.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81742738589 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66220651668 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535269709544 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2993359184 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7777777778 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337978058277 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143515691638 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880954247517 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19513574581 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0932480858028 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.