The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, an make comparisions where relevant.

Essay topics:

The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, an make comparisions where relevant.

The given charts provide data about the ages of population in both Italy and Yemen in 2000 as well as a prediction for these country for 2050.

In general, it can be seen that Yemen had the youngest population in 2000 and it is predicted the same for the year 2050. The proportion of elderly people is predicted to increase in both countries over the 50 year period.

With regard to Yemen, in 2000 just over a half the population were under 14, compared to just over 15% of italian in the same group. Only a small percentage of people in Yemen were over 60 at 3.6%, whereas in Italy the percentage of people over 60 were sligthly higher compared to that of Yemen at 14.3%. In 2000, people aged between 15-59 represented 46,6% and 61,6% in Yemen and Italy respectively.

It is predicted that the youngest group will decrease marginally from 50,1% to 37% in Yemen and from 14,3% to 11,5% in Italy in 2050. Projections also show that there will be an increase in the number of people over 60 years, with 42,3% and 5,7% in Yemen and Italy correspondingly.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the ages of population in both Italy and Yemen in 2000 as well as a prediction fo...
^^
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n that Yemen had the youngest population in 2000 and it is predicted the same for...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, well, whereas, in general, as well as, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52604166667 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49764971989 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484375 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.2912939744 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.625 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209250031194 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107690167484 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734472511719 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150294208932 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640089338104 0.0819641961636 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.