The diagram below shows the number of houses built per year in two cities, Derby and Nottingham, between 2000 and 2009.
The provided infographic compares the number of annually built housing in Derby and Nottingham throughout a decade between 2000 and 2009.
As can be seen, the number of houses fluctuated in the cities and this figure was overwhelming in Derby during the given period of time. Initially, in 2000, nearly the same number of houses, less than 50, was constructed in both cities. A year later, this figure reached over 50 housings in Nottingham, while it leveled off in Derby. However, in 2002, there was an abrupt decrease in the number of new houses in Nottingham to only 30 units, whereas, in Derby, this figure almost doubled reaching 75 houses. The number of yearly erected houses had not been changed for 5 years between 2003 and 2007 in Derby at the level of 120 houses. In contrast, this figure was rising gradually from 50 housings in 2003 to 75 units in 2005 in Nottingham; then there was again a dramatic slump in the number of newly constructed houses to 5 units in 2006.
For the last three years between 2007 and 2009, Nottingham experienced substantial changes in the number of erected houses: in 2007, this figure rocketed to 180 units, then, it slumped to 8 units in 2008, and finally, in 2009, it reached 250 houses. In contrast, Derby only experienced significant increases to 270 and 248 houses in 2008 and 2009, respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 122, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... overwhelming in Derby during the given period of time. Initially, in 2000, nearly the same nu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, then, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1114.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78111587983 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60657454823 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532188841202 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5409334709 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.777777778 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8888888889 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329063676623 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159317593975 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873196622346 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272360491033 0.15604864568 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811766559061 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.