Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth, which can cause tooth decay. (High acid levels are measured by low pH values)
Describe the information below and discuss the implications for dental health.
The graph compares the possibility of getting dental problems in 40 minutes after eating three kinds of sugar, namely fruit sugar, cane sugar and honey based on pH levels. The acid levels fluctuates considerably after utilizing these types of sugar. Additionally, in the fifth minute, it is the most risky to suffer from having tooth decays.
At the moment eaten, the pH level for all three counterparts was 7, which means the acid level is very low and it is unlikely to cause tooth decays. Five minutes after that, it is the most dangerous period for people who have eaten cane sugar, the pH level is incredibly low, about 3.5, which is absolutely acidic and can easily be destroyed by bacteria. At the same time, the figure for fruit sugar and honey was relatively low as well, which were about 4.2 and 4.7.
From this point to the fortieth minute, the patterns for these kinds of sugar all witnessed a remarkable increase and it is less likely to cause us dental problems as it grows. The pH levels for fruit sugar, cane sugar and honey are the same at this point, which is 7.
Overall, according to the graph provided shows that we should cut down on consuming sweet foods, especially cane sugar since tooth decays occurs more easily after eating this.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'fluctuate'.
Suggestion: fluctuate
...ney based on pH levels. The acid levels fluctuates considerably after utilizing these type...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71621621622 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28024496155 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558558558559 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.3029531299 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.875 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.75 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231530738297 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115630946003 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676301142618 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138465841887 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697268878711 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.