The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second paragraph shows the green house gas emission which result from this energy use
The pie charts illustrate the proportions of Australian household energy consumption and those of green house gas exhaust.
It is clear that the amount of gas exhaust is almost correspond with types of energy consumption. In addition, Australian citizens spend most their energy on heating while a majority of gas emission was generated by water heating.
As is observed, the energy utilised for heating occupies 42%, which is almost as twice as its green house exhaust ( 15%). In contrast, similarity can be witnessed in those of water heating, with 30% of energy use and 32% of gas emission.
Likewise, energy consumed for refrigeration is insignificant low at 7%, which is as half as the figure for gas exhaust. Moreover, australian citizens use the minority of their energy for cooling and lightning and consequently they generate small amounts of gas exhaust which contribute 3% and 8% respectively
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'corresponded'.
Suggestion: corresponded
...hat the amount of gas exhaust is almost correspond with types of energy consumption. In ad...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...most as twice as its green house exhaust 15%. In contrast, similarity can be witn...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, likewise, moreover, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 768.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 146.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2602739726 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47606760199 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94083779358 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58904109589 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.5698924287 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.714285714 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5714285714 5.23603664747 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29157578651 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147819746232 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518296447821 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197676152077 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396123190097 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.