The pie charts below illustrate the domestic energy consumption in Australia with six different ways and the greenhouse gas that is emitted through these ways.
According to the first chart, it is transparent that heating and water heating account for approximately one third of the Australian domestic energy usage by 42 and 30 percent respectively. In contrast, refrigeration, lighting and cooling use slight proportions of energy consumption by 7, 4 and only 2 percent, while other appliances form 15 percent of energy consumed.
When it comes to second pie chart, it is obviously demonstrated heating is just responsible for 15 percent of household greenhouse gas emissions that is approximately one third of its usage of energy. Meanwhile, water heating almost maintains a balance between energy consumption and greenhouse gas that is emitted by 32 percent. On the other hand, the gas produced by refrigeration is doubled in comparison with its energy usage. Beside, cooling and lighting are very less significant causes of the greenhouse gas emission, although other appliances by using 15 percent of energy emit almost double proportion of the greenhouse gas (28%).
In conclusion, it is manifestly noticeable that the heating produces very low rate of greenhouse gas compared with its energy consumption, so it is more environment-friendly than other sorts of using energy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th six different ways and the greenhouse gas that is emitted through these ways. ...
^^^
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...endly than other sorts of using energy.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, third, while, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1200.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47945205479 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23874039344 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511415525114 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 365.4 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.290934154 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.0 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 5.23603664747 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255003044916 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124633331065 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.027561059792 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166366057567 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213805228747 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.2329268293 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.