The two pie charts illustrate statistical information respectively regarding how energy is used in an average Australian household and the greenhouse gas emissions that result from these energy uses.
First let us talk about the energy consumption of household facilities in Australia. Heating possesses the largest proportion of total energy usage in family unit, accounting for 42%, followed by the figure for water heating which also occupies a large percentage with 30%. In contrast, the data for refrigeration，lighting，cooling are much less significant, 7%, 4% and only 2% respectively. Finally, the remaining 15% of the consumption is used on other appliances.
As for the situation of greenhouse gas emissions from the appliances mentioned above, it largely differs from the last pie. First, heating, which consumes the greatest amount of energy, shows a smaller share in greenhouse gas emission, listed in the third place with a proportion of 15%, while the biggest share of emissions is from water heating (32%). By comparison, proportions of greenhouse gas emissions in refrigeration, lighting and cooling almost double their figures for energy use. CO2 derived from other appliances consist of the remaining 28%.
Overall, it is noticeable that heating is the most environmentally friendly appliance while water hearing not only consumes more energy sources but also give out the most carbon dioxide. Meanwhile, although refrigeration and lighting consume less, they emit more as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...share of emissions is from water heating 32% . By comparison, proportions of gree...
^^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... of emissions is from water heating 32% . By comparison, proportions of greenhous...
^^
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...d lighting consume less, they emit more as well.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, regarding, so, third, well, while, as for, in contrast, in the third place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1282.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62280701754 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.51722802837 2.65546596893 132% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622807017544 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.624034307 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.545454545 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 5.23603664747 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30213681851 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106406646745 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121191622644 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199223272966 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159509286885 0.0819641961636 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 40.7170731707 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.