The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USAsince 1980 with projections until 2030

The give line graph compares the consumption of fuel in six different category: petrol and oil, coal, natural gases, nuclear, solar or wind and hydropower from year 1980 to 2030 in America.

It is apparent that the petrol is the most consumed fuel in America. It is projected that use of petrol will be hiked rapidly from 2015 to 2030. The coal consumption is second highest and natural gases consumption is third highest. However, natural gases consumption was higher than coal in 1980. Natural gases use is projected to remain consistent to year 2030 from 2015.

The least used fuel were nuclear, solar or wind and hydropower from the year 1980 to 1990. Nuclear, solar or wind and hydropower remained consistently same from the year 1980 to 1990. However, at the projected year 2015 to 2030 hydropower remain constant and fell from 2050. The projection estimates that hydropower will be least used fuel in America. Nuclear and solar or wind is fourth and fifth consumed energy respectively. The growth of consumption of nuclear and solar or wind is steady.

In conclusion, petrol is most consumed fuel and it is estimated that its use will hike too. This rise in use of petrol shows that America has more number of vehicles which run on petrol. The growth of nuclear and solar were nearly consistent whereas, coal and natural gases are rising steadily.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'category' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'categories'.
Suggestion: categories
...he consumption of fuel in six different category: petrol and oil, coal, natural gases, n...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, third, whereas, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90476190476 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51660775511 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.428571428571 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.1795971338 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.5333333333 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169793541615 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707213217944 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562033124399 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120690175659 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730751320839 0.0819641961636 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.