The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five-year period.
The bar graph depicts the money exhausted on various modes of entertainment in the interval of five years. The spectacular feature of the chart is a drastic elevation in the expenditure on these activities.
At a fleeting glance, it is understandably observed that in 1995, Asians spent $67 billion on such activities which broadly included Television and Publishing. However, Europeans paid an almost equal amount on the Television and Publishing while a little less on the Music. Not just this, the Americans were keenly interested in the Publishing whereas the cinema along with video was also renowned among them.
Switching to the next time period, Asians developed the greater fascination for the television while others activities surged gradually. Moreover, Europeans soared their lay out by $34 billion by rocketing the attention in television and publishing and making consistency in others. Even besides, United States proliferated their attraction towards all activities.
All-in-all, United States of America incremented their interest while Europeans maintained to such an extent.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66666666667 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04690000372 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.678787878788 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.868923331 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.888888889 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0826055303811 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332706174267 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591636874084 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0506864210472 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543294621322 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 61.2550243902 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.4140731707 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.