The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013.
The line chart shows how many people visited three different museums in London from June to September in 2013. Overall, the number of people visited British Museum and Science Museum increased, while the figure for Natural History Museum fell. It is also clear that the most people preferred to go sightseeing the British Museum, despite a minor fluctuation.
In June, the British Museum witnessed the highest number of visitors, with 600,000. The figures for the Natural History Museum and the Science Museum were lower, at 550,000 and 400,000 respectively. In July, the British Museum received 750,000 of visitors. This number then declined to 500,000 of visitors in August, whilst the Science Museum saw a gradual decrease in the number of tourists, to 300,000, over the period of 2 months. Likewise, the number of visitors to the Natural History Museum dropped considerably to just above 40,000 and remained stable till August.
By September, a similar trend can be seen in the number of visitors to the 3 museums. There was a steady increase in the number of visitors to the British Museum and the Science Museum, at 650,000 and 450,000 respectively. Similarly, the number of people went to see the Natural History Museum had grown slightly to just over 450,000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...l History Museum and the Science Museum were lower, at 550,000 and 400,000 respectiv...
^^^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ceived 750,000 of visitors. This number then declined to 500,000 of visitors in Augu...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'if', 'likewise', 'similarly', 'so', 'then', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.282051282051 0.268076937826 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.102564102564 0.116061578633 88% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0683760683761 0.0759168565197 90% => OK
Adverbs: 0.042735042735 0.0366838410393 116% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0042735042735 0.0131127313244 33% => OK
Prepositions: 0.128205128205 0.155750635184 82% => OK
Participles: 0.0128205128205 0.0379272487307 34% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.54651558992 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.042735042735 0.0210936926555 203% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.119658119658 0.0948980150116 126% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0042735042735 0.00437022459523 98% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0042735042735 0.00967000014798 44% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1271.0 1161.00487805 109% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.9 106% => OK
Chars per words: 6.08133971292 5.90752243213 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73763899035 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.473684210526 0.337110787985 141% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.325358851675 0.247514529752 131% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.148325358852 0.171178102325 87% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0765550239234 0.112407865282 68% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54651558992 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531100478469 0.546246751206 97% => OK
Word variations: 47.723035383 49.3433353143 97% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 8.93414634146 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0094962315 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5359833801 42.9750493124 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.545454545 135.714022679 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 23.0094962315 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.636363636364 0.689975730869 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.48048780488 135% => OK
Readability: 51.5358851675 47.7609492067 108% => OK
Elegance: 2.82857142857 2.94281807926 96% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415135318953 0.418131533498 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.181946136746 0.181151798455 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0573375517949 0.0850326197045 67% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.678793011737 0.706616315825 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0790067329822 0.157042692854 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.237611052023 0.228904883108 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665644735932 0.108899403657 61% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.602268946799 0.367819155151 164% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.143577896259 0.0812612215331 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.341178737894 0.316326947829 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242610738119 0.0921553760075 26% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70731707317 243% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.08536585366 49% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 3.16585365854 284% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.02926829268 33% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 7.1512195122 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.