the line graph shows changes in the consumption of meat from 1955 to 2012.

Essay topics: the line graph shows changes in the consumption of meat from 1955 to 2012.

catus's picture

a glance at the line graph provided illustrates the changes in the consumption of various types of meat during the period from 1995 to 2012.

It is evident that beef was the most widely enjoyed almost the period except the last 2 years. In addition, broilers gained more popularity with the consistent increase over the period.

To specify, from just under 60 pounds per person in 1955, the consumption of beef saw a exponential growth, reaching a peak of 90 pounds in 1976. This figure, then, leveled out at over 75 pounds in 1988, before steadily declining to 50 pounds in 2012. It is interesting to note that prior to 1960s, broilers and turkey were not considered as food, however, broilers saw a soar from less than 20 pounds to a peak of 60 pounds in 2007. After that this declined slightly to approximately 55 pounds which surpassed the consumption of beef and was the highest number in 2012.

Besides, the lowest changes was witnessed in pork and turkey. From 50 pounds in 1995, the consumption of pork fluctuated between 50 pounds and 40 pounds all over the period, and become the third common meat listed. Strikingly, consumed from 1960s from a mere 5 pounds, the consumption of turkey increased slightly to over 10 pounds in 2012.

Votes: 
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by other users:
Post date Users Rates More about the essay
3 years 1 month ago Wanna 80 Read full essay
More essays by this user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
a glance at the line graph provided illus...
^
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...on in 1955, the consumption of beef saw a exponential growth, reaching a peak of ...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, so, then, third, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77419354839 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59271371579 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552995391705 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5393798392 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.6 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261372326327 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109444466212 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119836287433 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186106175168 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155320670008 0.0819641961636 189% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Pages