The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The maps depict the changes that took place in Stokefield village between 1930 and 2010. Although there are a few similarities between both maps, the village transformed from being predominantly farm land to a more residential community.

Due to the increase in the number of homes, new roads have had to have been built. By 2010, two roads in the northern part of the village, running perpendicular to the central road, provide connections to the new homes that have replaced farmland on the east and to those that have replaced shops on the west. The primary school has undergone some considerable expansion with two parallel units extending towards the east.

Towards the central part of the village, a street branching off of the main pre-existing road provides access to the new homes on the western side of the central road. The large house from 1930 has been converted into a retirement home, with an addition of two wings and the surrounding garden has been reduced almost by half to make room for new homes. The path that led to the big house in 1970 has also been developed into a connecting road. The farmland on the southern part of the map has also been completely replaced by new settlement.

Overall, despite the town's urban development and the disappearance of arable land, its post office and the central road have remained unperturbed over the years.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (7 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... been developed into a connecting road. The farmland on the southern part of the ma...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1144.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88888888889 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.655287468 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559829059829 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5428834517 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.4 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 5.23603664747 15% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0751689928704 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0355683664739 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052618705975 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0484698857771 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490865733956 0.0819641961636 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.