The pie charts below give information about world population in 1900 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words

Essay topics:

The pie charts below give information about world population in 1900 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

A glance at the two pie charts provided reveals some striking similarities in terms of the number of global citizens between 1900 and 2000.

Looking at the charts, it is definitely obvious that the world population increased dramatically during 100 years and Asia registered the largest figures from 1900 to 2000.

In 1900, the number of Asians accounted for a significant proportion in total population all over the world and it decreased considerably to 45% in 2000. There was a similar trend which was witnessed in Europe, with 25% in 1900 and a minority in 2000. And the population in others category and North America remained stable in both of two years.

By contrast, while there was just a very small number of Africans in 1900, it plunged suddenly in 2000, with 10%. The percentage of citizens in Latin America also followed an upward trend between the two years, rose from 3% to 8%. The most specific point was that in 2000, the population in Middle East and North Africa appeared and it stood at 6% in total.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (6 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79213483146 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57950831528 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578651685393 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.5266404958 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.625 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168950440633 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743472784292 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440601964117 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112483440614 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215576349945 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.