The issue of teaching method, in this day and age, has triggered a new round of heated debate. Some people argue that students will gain more knowledge from teachers in school than from other ways like internet and TV. Personally, I totally agree with this point of view.
Hardly can anyone deny the fact that school lessons will provide more knowledge to students than learning from Internet or Television. In the first place, discussing questions with teacher is very convenient and clearly. For example, we should type the whole question on the website to research what we prefer to know, but the system deletes some information because of the number limitation of letters sometimes. It is hard to find the right answer. However, we could ask our teacher face to face and discuss the deeper level of the question. In the second place, teachers know more practical methods to figure out questions. Some problems in special subject need students having enough practical experience. Not all of people like to share their own experience on the Internet. We, however, could ask our teachers. They are really friendly and helpful to help their students to face difficulty. For instance, my coach teaching me how to driving told me I can find his help after I finished my class, as he knows many new drivers are not good at preventing traffic accident.
Considerable though the advantages of lessons given by teachers are, there are still some negative views. Internet could provide us research service in all time whatever day and night. If you were to ask teacher in midnight, the Internet would be fit for you. But, everyone has a rest at night; no one would in that hurry.
In conclusion, I completely agree with the view that while using Internet and TV can learn more knowledge, lessons by teachers gives more cherished practical experience to students.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, really, second, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in the first place, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 1.00243902439 1197% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 5.60731707317 499% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 965.302439024 161% => OK
No of words: 314.0 196.424390244 160% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93949044586 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53380927854 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 106.607317073 178% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605095541401 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 283.868780488 165% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 8.94146341463 212% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.7594370185 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.6315789474 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5263157895 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36842105263 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312141964952 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810670183971 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930488646427 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190843166725 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508605288746 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.