the table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table shows data of average distance in miles travelled per person per year between 1985 and 2000 by eight different types of transport in England.
In 1985, people rarely chose taxi to travel so it's the lowest with only 13 people, the most preferred mode of travel is by car with 3199 people. The top position stays the same in 2000, rose to 4806 people, the taxi escaped the lowest in rank by increased 29 more people and the least preferred transportation has been replaced with bicycle, dropped from 51 to 41 people. Bicycle is one of the three mode of travel which decreased in 2000, the others are walking and espeacially local bus has the most dramatically fall in number contrast to the long distance bus. People tend to choose others transportation which lead to increase in others mode of travel and the biggest change in the table is the increase of usage in taxi which is triple in the 2000.
It is clear that there was an increase in overall travelling in England from 1985 to 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 31, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to taxi'
Suggestion: to taxi
...England. In 1985, people rarely chose taxi to travel so its the lowest with only 1...
^^^^
Line 2, column 49, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
..., people rarely chose taxi to travel so its the lowest with only 13 people, the mos...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57777777778 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40444547135 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561111111111 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.3730587142 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.333333333 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177319109209 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993247492483 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477348280481 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141322566636 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181605400934 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.88 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.