The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table compares average miles that people in England travelled between 1985 and 2000, by eight modes of travel.
At first glance, in 2000, people in England travelled more than in 1985. But in both years, using car, local bus and train is the most preferred. Walking, riding a bicycle, travelling by long distance bus or taxi, on the other hand, is less use.
For details, in 1985, people travelled 3199 miles by car. It jumped by 4806 miles in 2000. There was a noticeable decrease in local public transportation where it dropped from 429 miles in 1985 to 274 miles in 2000. This made train become the second popular mean of transportation in 2000, not local bus like before. Despite the reduction in average distance in miles, local bus was still one of the most favorite transportation English people use in the last year of 20th century.
The number of miles people walking decreased between two years (255 miles in 1985 and 237 miles in 2000). The same situation occured with other non-motorized vehicle such as bicycle. Although people travelled less miles by long distance bus and taxi, these two modes had a significant growth during the time of 1985 and 2000. The number of miles people travelled by long distance bus increased more than two times. It was more than 3 times with taxi.
Besides, the number of miles people spent on other mode of travel also went up, from 450 miles in 1985 to 585 miles in 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 208, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun miles is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...h as bicycle. Although people travelled less miles by long distance bus and taxi, th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, second, so, still, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1182.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70916334661 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37973033314 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513944223108 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1143861763 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7333333333 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06666666667 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147918101951 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675118768261 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720763947002 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125852940051 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780877853583 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.