The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.
Summarise the informatio
The table illustrates the information about underground railway systems regarding opening date, kilometers of route covered and passenger every year in six different cities.
Overall, the beginning of underground railway system was first occurred in London and also, it covered the maximum routes on comparing to all. However, the proportion of passengers was the highest in Tokyo whereas the least was of Los Angeles.
Underground railway system inaugurated in London in 1863 with covering 394 routes, being the maximum route covererage city, and carrying out 775 passengers per million every year. Whilst, Paris covered approximately half of the routes than London, however, Kyoto only covered 11 routes, being the lowest in this.
Similarly, Tokyo opened their railway system in 1972 and became the largest passenger covering railway system, wheras, Washington DC started their railways at 1976, covered only 126 routes and carried 144 passengers every year.likewise, Kyoto covered 11 routes and carried 45 passengers had the least contribution in this. Los Angeles opened their railway system in 2001 and covered 28 routes and carried only 50 passengers .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... year in six different cities. Overall, the beginning of underground railway sys...
^^
Line 4, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly 126 routes and carried 144 passengers every year.likewise, Kyoto covered 11 ro...
^^
Line 4, column 424, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...28 routes and carried only 50 passengers .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, likewise, regarding, similarly, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58757062147 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71750463857 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559322033898 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.7002872147 43.030603864 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.285714286 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5714285714 5.23603664747 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173063203332 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102513407214 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095626282787 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13995225596 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0976828533346 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.