The table below shows Carbon dioxide emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union. The Pie Chart shows the percentage of European Union funds being spent on different forms of transport.
The bar chart clearly illustrates the emission of carbon dioxide for various transportation vehicles given in Grams per passenger per km in European countries; further graph depicts the spending of European Union on these vehicles.
As far as concerned the bar chart, it is quite clear that the air transport generate more than thrice air pollution than any other form of transportation around 375 gm per km. while in others vehicles cars comes on second, they produce almost 175 gm per km, than buses more than 50 gm per km, while others vehicles namely Coaches, Maritime and Rail are responsible to produce around 50 gram of carbon dioxide.
The Pie charts shows the European Union allocates 52 percent of their total budget on roads. Moreover they spend 31 percent on Railways than 10 percent on public transport. On the contrast, they spend only 1 or 2 percent on other forms of transport Inland Water, ports, Airports, and Unknown respectively.
It is clear from above discussion that air transport are responsible for more emission of carbon dioxide and European countries focus and spend more on Roads.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...il are responsible to produce around 50 gram of carbon dioxide. The Pie charts sh...
^^^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...percent of their total budget on roads. Moreover they spend 31 percent on Railways than ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ountries focus and spend more on Roads.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05945945946 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65793188385 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583783783784 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7083480159 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.714285714 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258748926421 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135877721039 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848459244437 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17412154638 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650456587391 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.