The table below shows the numbers of visitors to AshdownMuseum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan
The table and the chart compare the total of the Ashdown Museum’s guests and their satisfaction throughout the year before and after it was renovated. Overall, the total of visitor increased slightly, and dissatisfied of people become fewer based the survey.
After the improvement work, the museum got 92,000 visitant over the first year which grew from 74,000 in the last year before the restoration. Additionally, there was a small rise on visitor’s comfort which stood at 35% previous to refurbishment but climbed 40%. Likewise, the rate of people who felt very satisfied went up significantly by 20% which reached 35% of the total.
On the other hand, before the development customer’s disappointment was initially 40% then, it went down massively to just 15% over the year after the renewal. Similarly, the percentage of guests who were very displeased also dropped, which leveled out 5% from 10%. Finally, respondents with no reply remained at 5% before and after the repair of the museum.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, likewise, similarly, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25766871166 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01907818318 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644171779141 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.1544509356 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.125 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212623745438 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871990679404 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535948418113 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149056989306 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362528012641 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.