The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates the percentage of wide variety of poor people, classified by family type, in Australia in 1999.
Overall, the last variable has a percentage of 11% that means 1.8 million Australian inhabitants lived in poverty in that period. Most of them were sole parents or single without children cumulating together 40% of individuals.
In terms of poor households, 12 out of 100 couples with children were poorest having a number of 933 thousands of people which represents almost one-half of all households. Just a small part of aged couples (4%) contributed at the entire proportion of poor people. Not far were the single aged person, 5% of these were destitute with only 54 thousand of individuals.
In spite of a lower percentage of disadvantaged couples without children of 7%, they have recorded in a large number individuals, 211 thousand. In opposite case, are obviously sole parents with the highest proportion of people (21%), but with only 232 thousands of citizens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 66, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'were the poorest'.
Suggestion: were the poorest
...ds, 12 out of 100 couples with children were poorest having a number of 933 thousands of peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 98, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '933 thousand'.
Suggestion: 933 thousand
...hildren were poorest having a number of 933 thousands of people which represents almost one-half...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e with only 54 thousand of individuals. In spite of a lower percentage of disadv...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 247, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '232 thousand'.
Suggestion: 232 thousand
...proportion of people 21%, but with only 232 thousands of citizens.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'so', 'in spite of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.275675675676 0.268076937826 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.0972972972973 0.116061578633 84% => OK
Adjectives: 0.102702702703 0.0759168565197 135% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0432432432432 0.0366838410393 118% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0108108108108 0.0131127313244 82% => OK
Prepositions: 0.194594594595 0.155750635184 125% => OK
Participles: 0.0216216216216 0.0379272487307 57% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.92826910395 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0 0.0210936926555 0% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0756756756757 0.0948980150116 80% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0108108108108 0.00967000014798 112% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 999.0 1161.00487805 86% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.9 82% => OK
Chars per words: 6.16666666667 5.90752243213 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73763899035 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.376543209877 0.337110787985 112% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.314814814815 0.247514529752 127% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.216049382716 0.171178102325 126% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.154320987654 0.112407865282 137% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92826910395 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.546246751206 115% => OK
Word variations: 58.4565808257 49.3433353143 118% => OK
How many sentences: 8.0 8.93414634146 90% => OK
Sentence length: 20.25 23.0094962315 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.5342906696 42.9750493124 59% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.875 135.714022679 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 23.0094962315 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.689975730869 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.48048780488 270% => OK
Readability: 51.7314814815 47.7609492067 108% => OK
Elegance: 3.25 2.94281807926 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365486456707 0.418131533498 87% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.13497057583 0.181151798455 75% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0522741341916 0.0850326197045 61% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.722126551727 0.706616315825 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.125857657513 0.157042692854 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.201916907455 0.228904883108 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09875250397 0.108899403657 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.350485914286 0.367819155151 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.100455704534 0.0812612215331 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288634222177 0.316326947829 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849694490656 0.0921553760075 92% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70731707317 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.14146341463 438% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.08536585366 73% => OK
Positive topic words: 0.0 3.16585365854 0% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 5.0 0.956097560976 523% => Less negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.02926829268 66% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 7.1512195122 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.