The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
This is a numerical table, which describe the poverty level of households in Australia in 1999. The general poverty level during the period is 11%, with nearly two million people are suffering from low income. This level differs among different family types.
Meanwhile, the highest percentage of 21%, who are living in poverty is recorded in sole parent families. This is closely followed by single family types, with 19% has been recorded in the period. Further, the cumulative numbers of these two types of families represent around 60% of total poor households.
On contrast, the lowest poverty is recorded in aged couple families, which is nearly a half a percentage of general household poverty level. In addition, single aged person families have recorded 2% higher percentage than the aged couple families and reported to be the next lowest proportion.
On the other hand, 933,000 couples with children are under poverty line, which is nearly half of total households living under poverty line, which is nearly half of total households living under poverty line. Furthermore, 211,000 couples without any children are suffering due to poverty.
In conclusion, families consist of elderly population have recorded lower poverty affected population. However, adults without children have reflected higher percentage, who are greatly affected by poverty. Further, the families with children are moderately affected.
Discourse Markers used:
['furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'while', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.291338582677 0.268076937826 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.157480314961 0.116061578633 136% => OK
Adjectives: 0.106299212598 0.0759168565197 140% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0393700787402 0.0366838410393 107% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0 0.0131127313244 0% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.133858267717 0.155750635184 86% => OK
Participles: 0.0551181102362 0.0379272487307 145% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.59301234413 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00787401574803 0.0210936926555 37% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0748031496063 0.0948980150116 79% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0236220472441 0.00967000014798 244% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1427.0 1161.00487805 123% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.9 111% => OK
Chars per words: 6.51598173516 5.90752243213 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73763899035 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.493150684932 0.337110787985 146% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.365296803653 0.247514529752 148% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.24200913242 0.171178102325 141% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.132420091324 0.112407865282 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59301234413 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520547945205 0.546246751206 95% => OK
Word variations: 47.1267008356 49.3433353143 96% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 8.93414634146 146% => OK
Sentence length: 16.8461538462 23.0094962315 73% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5172047019 42.9750493124 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.769230769 135.714022679 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8461538462 23.0094962315 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.615384615385 0.689975730869 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.84146341463 130% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 53.3758342115 47.7609492067 112% => OK
Elegance: 2.44 2.94281807926 83% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388070722531 0.418131533498 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.117187380647 0.181151798455 65% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0932362590231 0.0850326197045 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.619777703215 0.706616315825 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.137206952595 0.157042692854 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167748809334 0.228904883108 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103484544905 0.108899403657 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.261400862849 0.367819155151 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0824333444558 0.0812612215331 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246182631195 0.316326947829 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892625713373 0.0921553760075 97% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70731707317 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 1.14146341463 964% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.08536585366 49% => OK
Positive topic words: 0.0 3.16585365854 0% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 10.0 0.956097560976 1046% => Less negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.02926829268 66% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 7.1512195122 168% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.