The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink housing clothing and entertainment

Essay topics:

The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink, housing, clothing and entertainment.

The table shows the household expenditure in different European countries in term of four important categories.

Overall, it is obvious that the householders in five nations spent a the vast majority of their income on Food and Drink and Housing, but much less on Clothing and Entertainment

As can be seen from the table, in British, German and French households, the highest category was Housing, which represented over one third of the total expenditure, at 37%, 33% and 31% respectively spent on housing. In contrast, they spent around a roughly quarter on Food and Drink. However, this pattern was reversed for Turkey and Spain, who spent around a fifth of their income on Housing, but approximately almost a third on Food and Drink.

The whole countries spent much less on Clothing and Entertainment. In term of Clothing, France and Spain consumed the least at less than 10%, while this accounted for the same amount in the other three countries, ranging from 11% to 15%. Expenditure on Entertainment in Germany was the highest, at 19%, whereas UK and Turkey spent half of this amount, with France and Spain's consuming between those other three nations.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (4 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: a; the
... the householders in five nations spent a the vast majority of their income on Food ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t a the vast majority of their income on Food and Drink and Housing, but much les...
^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r one third of the total expenditure, at 37%, 33% and 31% respectively spent on h...
^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('roughly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('quarter') instead of another adjective.
...housing. In contrast, they spent around a roughly quarter on Food and Drink. However, this patter...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, third, whereas, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05699481865 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78317932288 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59067357513 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 105.135286995 43.030603864 244% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 139.428571429 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235702656962 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11395894464 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784833875299 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163749027845 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848880054057 0.0819641961636 104% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.