The tables below give information about
sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas
in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
The table
s show
how fairtrade coffee and banana sales changed in five countries in 2004
compared to 1999.
Overall, Coffee sales rose in all countries with the highest sales observed in
Switzerland. Banana sales also rose in all but two countries, and w
ere highest in the UK.
In 1999, the
most significant coffee sales, 3 million (3m) euros were
reported
in Switzerland, and
they doubled in 2004. The figure for the UK was originally 50% lower than that
for
Switzerland
(1.5m)
while sales in Denmark were
slightly higher (1.8m). However,
while the former rose
dramatically to 20m, the latter remained relatively stable. There was little difference between
the figures for Belgium (1m) and Sweden (0.8m), and both experienced noticeable increases to
1.7m and 1m,
respectively.
UK
had the highest banana sales in both years, as they rose over threefold from 15 million euros
to 47m.
Swiss
sales were originally almost twice as high as those of
Denmark
(1 and 0.6m,
respectively), and both surged, reaching 5.5 and 4m. T
here was little difference between the
figures for Sweden and
Belgium
(2 and 1.8m, respectively), and both nearly halved to reach
about 1m in 2004.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... sales changed in five countries in 2004 compared to 1999. Overall, Coffee sales...
^^^
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tries with the highest sales observed in Switzerland. Banana sales also rose in a...
^^^
Line 9, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ere highest in the UK. In 1999, the most significant coffee sales, 3 million...
^^^
Line 10, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt coffee sales, 3 million 3m euros were reported in Switzerland, and they do...
^^^
Line 11, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ales, 3 million 3m euros were reported in Switzerland, and they doubled in 20...
^^^
Line 12, column 20, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...os were reported in Switzerland, and they doubled in 2004. The figure for the...
^^^
Line 13, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he UK was originally 50% lower than that for Switzerland 1.5m while sales i...
^^^
Line 14, column 4, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was originally 50% lower than that for Switzerland 1.5m while sales in Denm...
^^^
Line 15, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 50% lower than that for Switzerland 1.5m while sales in Denmark were sli...
^^^
Line 16, column 5, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wer than that for Switzerland 1.5m while sales in Denmark were slightly h...
^^^
Line 17, column 28, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and 1.5m while sales in Denmark were slightly higher 1.8m. However, while th...
^^^
Line 19, column 22, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er 1.8m. However, while the former rose dramatically to 20m, the latter remained...
^^^
Line 20, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ble. There was little difference between the figures for Belgium 1m and Sweden 0....
^^^
Line 21, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...both experienced noticeable increases to 1.7m and 1m, respectively. UK had ...
^^^
Line 25, column 3, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s to 1.7m and 1m, respectively. UK had the highest banana sales in both yea...
^^^
Line 26, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ose over threefold from 15 million euros to 47m. Swiss sales were originally ...
^^^
Line 28, column 6, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... from 15 million euros to 47m. Swiss sales were originally almost twice as hi...
^^^
Line 29, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ginally almost twice as high as those of Denmark 1 and 0.6m, respectively, and...
^^^
Line 31, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... high as those of Denmark 1 and 0.6m, respectively, and both surged, reaching ...
^^^
Line 33, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... here was little difference between the figures for Sweden and Belgium 2 and ...
^^^
Line 34, column 23, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce between the figures for Sweden and Belgium 2 and 1.8m, respectively, and b...
^^^
Line 36, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctively, and both nearly halved to reach about 1m in 2004.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1029.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66716717068 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586734693878 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.827311126 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.9 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 18.0 3.83414634146 469% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 22.0 1.69756097561 1296% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0816453483038 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412452427568 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648395671883 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0164205264684 0.15604864568 11% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374079262741 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.