The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The information is given in two maps is about changes of an island in terms of tourist facilities after a construction.
From the overview perspective, the number of facilities increased significantly, especially the number of place to accommodate.
Firstly, there was no accommodation before and after the construction, the number of accommodations was over 10 and it was the most common place on this island. Moreover, places for other purposes such as restaurant and reception were built in the central area of the island to easily satisfy visitor’s demands.
Secondly, in the past, there was nothing on the sea and after the reconstruction, some of the facilities were built. Particularly, the area around the beach was improved and visits could come here to go for a swim. Furthermore, there was a footpath from the reception to a pler which serve visitors who want to get on the boats and discover around the island.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 83, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...n the sea and after the reconstruction, some of the facilities were built. Particularly, th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 780.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09803921569 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19995888307 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.1351337245 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.428571429 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 5.23603664747 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129656161561 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065386665065 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861367266155 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955375466068 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10161468385 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.