The company you work for has decided to close the cafeteria as staff are not using it much. You are unhappy about it. Write a letter to the supervisor / director (someone in authority)-Asking not to close it-Inform what feel is the cause of staff not usin

Essay topics:

The company you work for has decided to close the cafeteria as staff are not using it much. You are unhappy about it. Write a letter to the supervisor / director (someone in authority)
- Asking not to close it
- Inform what feel is the cause of staff not using it.
- How can things be improved in the cafeteria.

Dear Sir or Madam,

I learnt of management's decision to close down the staff canteen due to low patronage and I am writing to express my unhappiness with the plan.

If shutdown, staff will have to go out, to find places to eat and the closest eatery around is about thirty minutes drive from the office. This will cause some employees to spend more than the normal one hour given for lunch breaks. Also, the cafeteria was created to check the quality of food that staff eat, after it was reported by our medical team, that some staff don't eat healthy. Therefore, if closed, there will be no way for management to measure these factors. In view of these, I would ask that we do not close the canteen.

The major cause of the low patronage by our employees is mainly the high cost of meals at the canteen. While one can eat for a thousand Naira in any standard eatery in the city, our cafeteria charges one thousand five hundred Naira for a standard meal. Most personnel argue that with that amount, they can cook what will last them for three days at home.

To boost sales, I suggest that the price of meals are lowered to the rate that the other staff canteens around charge. I also suggest that the waiters be retrained on how to deal with customers. Many of our employees have complained on how the food servers talk to them each time they raise a concern in the eatery.

I look forward to seeing these recommendations implemented. It will be a win-win for all.

Yours faithfully,
Okoronkwo Alfred Chinedu.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ed by our medical team, that some staff dont eat healthy. Therefore, if closed, ther...
^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'therefore', 'while']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.228476821192 0.220444632235 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.158940397351 0.167888034529 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0629139072848 0.0606518309736 104% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0264900662252 0.0506257000042 52% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0596026490066 0.118615021944 50% => OK
Prepositions: 0.132450331126 0.107062808482 124% => OK
Participles: 0.0298013245033 0.041066498444 73% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.36183277052 2.54303337028 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.046357615894 0.0385302599488 120% => OK
Particles: 0.00993377483444 0.00132118243153 752% => OK
Determiners: 0.112582781457 0.0714148451538 158% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0264900662252 0.0191574576366 138% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00993377483444 0.00930345855455 107% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1521.0 1141.60824742 133% => OK
No of words: 274.0 206.134020619 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55109489051 5.53046319177 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.78085437643 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.259124087591 0.284621296913 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.20802919708 0.211203875043 98% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.116788321168 0.133321485273 88% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0729927007299 0.0843313296314 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36183277052 2.54303337028 93% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 127.690721649 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598540145985 0.622163163488 96% => OK
Word variations: 64.1518863754 62.8969750728 102% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 12.9587628866 116% => OK
Sentence length: 18.2666666667 16.4300151701 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8277401931 44.7399317507 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.4 90.9928171075 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 16.4300151701 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.4 0.613754768223 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.29896907216 140% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.09278350515 48% => OK
Readability: 39.0695863747 37.5504026743 104% => OK
Elegance: 1.59459459459 1.13073093955 141% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425328562502 0.331212695627 128% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0892193664313 0.0927372745006 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0700179173564 0.0736520305886 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.601363484198 0.579516596996 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.189175947941 0.180689518051 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148164582954 0.122183219658 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895936030068 0.0765303033291 117% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.197106711742 0.211926503985 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.13665329642 0.0737400523855 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205097393922 0.203819188451 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121620616765 0.067151250289 181% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.45360824742 27% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.48453608247 472% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.0206185567 149% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 4.73195876289 21% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 6.0 1.03092783505 582% => Less negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.56701030928 156% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 8.32989690722 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.