the graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport

Essay topics:

the graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport

The graph below indicate that the numbers of goods conveyed in the UK during period from 1974 to 2002 by four altered method of carriage
At quick glance at the graph reveals that the produce delivered by road was by far highest the research period. On the other hand, the conveyance by pipeline is the lowest during the decade
This was the second options to deliveries the comedies in the UK in 1974. But the train was gradual fluctuation from 1974 to 2002. In 1978 it was lower than the products given by the sea, until 2002 with about 40 million tones it stayed at the third in four quantities of goods transport.
On the other hand, during this 23 years period the conveyance by road, by sea, by channel followed upward trend. In 1974 the road was by far the most popular of these transports with about 70 million tones. Afterward, it slightly increased from 1978 to 1998. Finally, it jumped at near 100 million tones in 2002. Similarly, the sea also rapidly rose from under 40 million tones to above 60 million tones between 1974 and 2002, although the sea was used to lower than the rail when conveyed the goods in the UK in 1978. The delivery by pipelines also grew up but much less significantly to just over 20 million tones in 2002. It is worth noting that while other types of conveyance changes, the pipeline remained the least popular transport throughout the period.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, second, similarly, so, third, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 32.9175257732 33% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 26.3917525773 216% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1139.0 937.175257732 122% => OK
No of words: 248.0 206.0 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59274193548 4.54256449028 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.78020617076 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30452985018 2.54303337028 91% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 127.690721649 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508064516129 0.622605031667 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 319.5 290.88556701 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.360824742268 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 1.44329896907 624% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.8162114099 44.8134815571 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.545454545 76.5299724578 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 16.8248392259 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 4.34317383033 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247148847212 0.216113520407 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890960958487 0.0766984524023 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673574936502 0.0603063233224 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173190181008 0.12726935374 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0987930609191 0.0580467560999 170% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 8.37731958763 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 70.7449484536 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 7.45979381443 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 8.71597938144 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 7.59969072165 102% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 41.2886597938 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 8.62886597938 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.