As computers are being used more and more in education, there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom. What extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that the artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly prevalent having a significant impact on all spheres of human life, in particular educational environment, leading to in the fact that the position of educators could be substituted swiftly. It seems to me that I absolutely disgree with this idea.
There is a undeniable fact that the technology probably plays a crucial part in morden classrooms due to various reasons. Firstly, it is likely to be a window of opportunity allowing students to handily access the source of enormous knowledge from diverse domains, via social medias, apps, websites. As a result, they may catch up with the latest information keeping pace with the global tendency. Secondly, advances in computers might definitely empower the study hours to be more appealing. This means that through lively videos, colorful images, it could afford to increase learner's concentration assisting the comprehension of lessons in being more effective.
Nevertheless, conventional teachers obviously have a indispensable role. The greatest important cause is that educators can provide children with the best way to master a variety of vital soft skills such as: communication skill, emotional skill, problem-solving skill, which are considered as a pivotal aspect contributing to their laying of foundation for their career path. By constrast, this is impossible done by robots. Furthermore, It appears that each individual is radically different from others. Therefore, Teachers are able to identity their characteristics like: intellectual capabilities or feeling in order to flexibly select appropriate methods inspiring them to absorb the lectures better, while computers are programmed in advance for objects equally.
In conclusion, Robots are a mere mechanisms which never enable to take the place of traditional teacher in schools, but it may be a capable assistant bringing about the enhancement of educational quality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 10, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...utely disgree with this idea. There is a undeniable fact that the technology pro...
^
Line 2, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... fact that the technology probably plays a crucial part in morden classrooms due ...
^^
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s, conventional teachers obviously have a indispensable role. The greatest import...
^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... skill, problem-solving skill, which are considered as a pivotal aspect contribut...
^^
Line 3, column 613, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ke: intellectual capabilities or feeling in order to flexibly select appropriate ...
^^
Line 4, column 34, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'mechanism'?
Suggestion: mechanism
...ally. In conclusion, Robots are a mere mechanisms which never enable to take the place of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62837837838 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21027727845 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679054054054 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.909946156 49.4020404114 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.153846154 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2307692308 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197821064957 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572513421524 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537621837289 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103607447838 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332400646919 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.92 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.