In recent years, the rapid development of technology has changed the way people work and study. Because of the affordable prices and wide accessibility of many modern innovations, many workers and students are now staying at home to finish their work. Despite some support, in my opinion, this is a negative trend.
Firstly, it is noteworthy that working at home can affect the efficiency in completing tasks. It is because there is no specific area which is suitable for work and privacy-insured since the working ones can be distracted by noises from other family members and neighbors, or from the temptation of food. Thereby, they cannot either work actively or relax, because their commission hasn’t been done yet. Hence, labors and children should go to schools and offices, which are specially designed for doing business in acquiring knowledge, so that they can take full of their advantages.
Secondly, working and studying at home might widen the gap between people. The counter argument raised by objectors is that Internet and such cutting edges can help users around the world to keep in touch, even if they are in Mars. This justification could be true to some extent, nevertheless, it should be acknowledged that many conversations require not only seeing each others face but also seeing gestures and emotions on behaviors for deep mutual understanding. for instants, virtual classes cannot be as successful as real classes because teachers are not able to know if their learners understand the lectures or not by looking at their actions. As a consequence, both teachers and students may find the subject unattractive and lose engagement.
In conclusion, although online working gains some benefits to human life, under no circumstances should workers and students overlook the significant effect of going to offices and schools.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ehaviors for deep mutual understanding. for instants, virtual classes cannot be as ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23569023569 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85461924331 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632996632997 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3308950216 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.615384615 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247939512231 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782880363581 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362997523295 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141297929408 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043465846955 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.