Some people think that they can make as much noise as they want while others think that the amount of noise people make should be strictly controlled Discuss both views and include your own opinion and examples

It is argue that some essential measures should be applied to control noise. Some individuals say that they have free to make as much as noise as they like. From my perspective, it would be better to reduce noise.

On the one hand, some people say that they can make as much noise as they want for various reasons. Firstly, many of them feel more comfortable and free while creating noise from different activities when working or entertaining. For example, making the volume louder to enjoy their favorite songs, although it may disturb their next-door neighbors. Secondly, many people often consider noise is a part of industrialization and modernization process. Traffic noise, engine noise have become more familiar with urban citizens.

On the other hand, I believe that it is important to impose some laws to strictly control noise. The first reason is that, it has lots of harmful impacts on people's health. For instance, some of my friends can not sleep at night because of noise from a nearby industrial zone. If this situation lasts long, it may lead to some problems for mental and physical health. Furthermore, productivity of works can be reduced as a consequence of noise. Many white-collar workers can not concentrate on their tasks due to noise from vehicles in the streets.

In conclusion, it seems to me that noise should be limited to have a better life. Although some people want to make a lot of noise without any consideration for others.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'argued'.
Suggestion: argued
It is argue that some essential measures should be ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1222.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92741935484 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75356877506 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572580645161 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 17.9648093505 49.4020404114 36% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.375 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360297611275 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117755709644 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098775436007 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236135733635 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413435564209 0.056905535591 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

It is widely argued that some essential measures should be applied to control noise. While many individuals say that they have the freedom to make noise as they like, I would believe that it would be better to reduce noise.
On the one hand, some people like to make as much noise as they want for various reasons. Firstly, some of them feel comfortable and free when creating noise while working or entertaining, which can also help them relieve stress. For example, turning the volume louder to enjoy favorite songs and sing along to them can uplift someone's mood, increasing the productivity of work as a result. Furthermore, People often consider noise as a part of the industrialization and modernization process, therefore it is unavoidable. Traffic noise or engine noise seems to have become more familiar to urban citizens. So strict controls on noise are unnecessary.
On the other hand, I would advocate that noise should be reduced to avoid unpredictable repercussions. One of the clear detrimental impacts is that exposure to noise for a long time can cause health problems, especially hearing ones. In fact, citizens who live nearby industrial zones or recreational centers are more likely to suffer from mental illness, such as sleeplessness or impaired hearing due to noise pollution. Another compelling reason is that noise might give rise to a decrease in the effectiveness of work since some people cannot concentrate. In other words, people tend to distract somethings while working if there are influences from the surrounding environment, including noise.
In conclusion, along with the proliferation of industrialization, the generation of noise is inevitable. However, I still believe that the state should enact some solutions for mitigating noise to not only protect citizens’ health but also ensure the sustainable development of society as a whole.