The best way to resolve the international environmental problems is to increase the costs of fuel. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
According to the international experts, the most effective way which is proposed to deal with global environmental issues is raising the fuel prices. Personally, I probably believe that there are many other measures more effective than this solution.
Increasing the fuel costs is popularly considered as the best way to reduce the environmental damages all over the world; and it actually has some typical influences. When users need to pay more for fuel, they tend to restrict car use. Thus, it can lead to a reduction in exhaust emission which can not only slow the process of global warming, but it might also lessen the dependence on fossil fuels. In other words, increasing power source costs is able to contribute to improve the environmental status and reduce the pollutants, such as ash or smoke, from the fuel consumption.
However, it is not a sustainable way to tackle this issue and there are many possible solutions which are more successful and convincing than costly fuels. Firstly, by restricting the use of the private vehicles, people can cut off the large amount of gas and also reduce the ash discards. For example, in London, instead of using cars, people prefer walking or riding bikes to protect the environment. Secondly, because fossil fuels are non-renewable energy resources, seeking and investing for the alternative energy are extremely essential. Moreover, by applying the innovational technology, it is not impossible for experts to create the environmental friendly energy. Last but not least, energy is not the only field that people need to concern. Many other aspects, such as agriculture, aquaculture or domestic wastes, which also cause maney negative impacts to environment as well as consume the fuel for running the process. Therefore, sharing the international scientific knownledge relating to those fields is important so as to countries around the world can cooporate to resolve the environmental problems.
In conclusion, although increasing fuel costs would have some influences on tackling some global environmental issues, there are more effective ways to do this. Admittedly, the best way to save the environment is to improve human's consciousness as much as possible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1029, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...e relating to those fields is important so as to countries around the world can cooporat...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1870.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3125 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99016984509 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3818456274 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.875 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9375 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237434297932 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729370897223 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719356716489 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157132681817 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517292535277 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.