In the future, it seems more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planet to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement ?
In the next years, people tend to find difficulties to live on the Earth. Spending money to conduct some research is one of the people's idea to find another livable planet. I believe that we do not need to do it.
Wasting money to conduct some research would not have any impact if we keep making damage to our nature. Even if we find another livable planet, we need much more money to move and time to adapt with new environment. The best way to keep living on Earth is change our bad habits.
First, we must reduce plastic use in our daily life. It can save the plants from hazardous chemical substances. And we do not need to wait thousand years to decompose the plastics. The next thing we can do is reducing logging. It means we must minimize the use of wood-based products such as tissue and paper. We can reuse and recycle wood-based products so we do not need to buy new products.
Another way is by exploit the renewable resource. Lately, we like to use the unrenewable one and as the time goes by, we running out of it. When we use the renewable, we can save the other resource for our next generations and keeping the living cycle. The last and very important thing we need to do to save our planet is change our mindset. Modern people tend to use private vehicle to travel along with no aware of its pollution. We must realize that going out with public transportation is better. It seems simple and insignificant but if we do it for long time, we can save our beloved Earth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... to conduct some research is one of the peoples idea to find another livable planet. I ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
... substances. And we do not need to wait thousand years to decompose the plastics. The ne...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1220.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.40433212996 5.12529762239 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41378331272 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516245487365 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.7745944621 49.4020404114 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 64.2105263158 106.682146367 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5789473684 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.42105263158 7.06120827912 20% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143516188032 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544031972052 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449673718683 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121434461521 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682829861913 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.6 13.0946893788 50% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 50.2224549098 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.3001002004 57% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.65 12.4159519038 62% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.