A government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, many people suppose that the government should invest money to upgrade the train systems rather than roads. In my opinion, it has a lot of benefits to spend money on railways and I strongly agree with this idea that is improving railways.
Firstly, spending money on railways will build a modern train system encouraging people to use this kind of transport frequently, which give a hand to reduce the amount of private car every day. As a result, we can make use of train which is faster and more convenient for people to go around the city. Moreover, the railways have its own rays so the passengers do not have to worry about a traffic jam. If the government use more money to open the system such as operating new line reaching more destination, people can feel more comfortable when using the train.
Secondly, spending money on railways is also help lower the amount ò money government has to purchase for fixing roads. For example, people will use a train instead of their own car to go to work in the morning, it will minimize the burden on a road due to there are not lots of cars running on the street. Consequently, it can help to avoid damage causing by overload on the road.
In conclusion, there are several positive results we can get from using the money for railways instead of the roads. By focusing on railways, the government not only can save money but also not waste money on repairing the roads. Action speak louder than words, the government should conduct some policies to take advantage from this idea.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'helped'.
Suggestion: helped
...dly, spending money on railways is also help lower the amount ò money government has...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66058394161 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43960836103 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547445255474 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8972098163 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.416666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06120827912 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274556979278 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10949215967 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886250934085 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193525922965 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0911523215758 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.