It is important to consider how the governments should spend its money in related to transport development. In most of developed countries, unless they live in remote areas, public transport is the main method for people to avoid congestion and traffic jam. Due to this reason, governments should focus more on improving and developing railways rather than roads.
First of all, to expand the existing or open a new road, it requires more lands which will destroy the nature and the ecosystem of the world. Expanding road means to encourage people to travel by their own cars which will produce more emissions, which will ruin the environment. Although pollution is also caused when we are expanding or operating new railways, but it brings less damage to the environment as trains produce fewer emissions than cars and is seen as an environmentally friendly way to travel. Furthermore, most traffic jams occur during the peak hours, thus people prefer train during these hours so that they will not be late for schools and works. With the increase in demand for trains, governments are expected to pay more attention to improve these.
On the other hand, it can be argued that many people prefer to travel by their car as they feel uncomfortable in the crowded trains during peak hours or they do not want to carry their stuff when travelling. Those people should be educated by the government how the diminution of traveling by cars can improve our environment.
All things considered, governments should encourage people to travel by train to protect our environment; and thus, they should spend more money on the improvement and development of railways rather than roads.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, so, thus, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01792114695 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71395993912 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559139784946 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.0696149917 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.272727273 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143738005954 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699553826655 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768940002224 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113946070915 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732462034332 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.