It is a common knowledge that rail lines and roads play a key role in commuting and communication, So many believe that governments should invest many budgets to construct the railway but some people think building roads need to pay attention more.
On the one hand, constructing roads have 2 main benefits. Firstly, from my point of view, drivers can transit passengers, goods by different means of transportation such as car, bus, lorry due to variation of vehicles. Secondly, commuting on roads provides possibilities to stop wherever want to rest or shop. However, unlike rail line, governments may be enforced to devote many funds to construct roads because of preventing traffic jam. What is more, roads cause many accident and much pollution due to burning fossil fuels and immense congestion there.
On the other hand, as far as my experience concerned, rail line are usually located far away from main cities. Also, it requires to destructing any locks for instances mountain, building, jungle and river. As a consequence, it probably needs to allocate a large number of budgets. Furthermore, trains are low speed and time-taking modes of transportation. On the contrary, the truth is that safety and reducing traffic congestion is one of the issues in which government should pay attention to more. Also, in my view, rails can carry hundred of people ans several tones of goods.
In conclusion, whereas expense financial on roads infrastructure can be useful, I am of the opinion that railway progression is a decisive factor in inhibition of current transport system problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'destructing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: destructing
...way from main cities. Also, it requires to destruct any locks for instances mountain, buil...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ires to destruct any locks for instances mountain, building, jungle and river. As...
^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'needs'?
Suggestion: needs
...nd river. As a consequence, it probably need to allocate a large number of budgets. ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...nsequence, it probably need to allocate a large number of budgets. Furthermore, trains are low sp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 530, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...more. Also, in my view, rails can carry hundred of people ans several tones of goods. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view, on the contrary, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84557481012 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.644 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2105432686 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0769230769 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.6923076923 7.06120827912 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0839091859338 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0251997612727 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0248871751599 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0536112017186 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0148464838045 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.