It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people.To what extend do you agree or disagree
University graduation for the youth is heated topic of controversy. It is often argued that there is no possibility or beneficial for the country that many young generation got the university degree. However I disagree that, it is neither applicable nor purposeful for the nation that plenty of young people to provide university places, because the country development and economy is behind the hand of youth, so that, high proportion of young people holding the university degree is an asset of a country.
Having said that, government should spend money and opportunity to the students who are willing to go for university for the higher studies and researches would leads to the countries overall development and standard of living. Every government parties should assign budget for the tertiary education and facilities, all university board should conduct program for the improvement of facility and faculty of an institution might help the university places for the youth. All in all, it is possible and useful for the country.
It is considered as a fallacy that, many university places which leads to the unemployment which might become crime, and other social problems. Overall, despite the fact that, students who has good university back ground opted for several employees to go for the esteemed position. Highly educated young generation make use of political development, economical growth, and advanced technology as well.
In conclusion, every country can provide good university places for their residential youth would increase the overall development of a nation and advancement. Instead of disadvantage country could study for the outweigh of the tertiary education of the young generation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...g generation got the university degree. However I disagree that, it is neither applica...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ation got the university degree. However I disagree that, it is neither applicabl...
^^
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it is neither applicable nor purposeful for the nation that plenty of young peop...
^^
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...the higher studies and researches would leads to the countries overall development an...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s possible and useful for the country. It is considered as a fallacy that, many...
^^^
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...any university places which leads to the unemployment which might become crime, a...
^^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...tion make use of political development, economical growth, and advanced technology as well...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...of disadvantage country could study for the outweigh of the tertiary education of the young ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44194756554 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89770515103 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539325842697 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.0384252996 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.090909091 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391913631903 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157406079343 0.084324248473 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565135549393 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245943754446 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649634990852 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.