many countries spend too much money on training of a few individuals for international sports competition Some people believe that government should spend more in ordinary people instead Do you agree r disagree give your opinion and example

Essay topics:

many countries spend too much money on training of a few individuals for international sports competition. Some people believe that government should spend more in ordinary people instead. Do you agree r disagree. give your opinion and example

Submitted by tajveer on Wed, 09/21/2016 - 01:05

International sporting event has become major way to bring any country in limelight. countries have been tend to spend money in bulk on few best players in order to perform out of skin in these international sporting events. Whether government should spend all his sporting quota money on few players or they should give chance to ordinary people as well has sparked a heated debate. Here, i would like to swayed by the given statement
There are multifarious points to shore up my view. First and foremost, every individual has similar worth of their votes in any nation. Therefor, similar importance ought to be given while selecting players for international sporting events. In addition, some ordinary people have fascinating sporting skills which can be utilized by a nation by giving them fair selection. For instance, the great Indian cricketer Sachin tendulkar belonged to a normal family but made some mind blowing records.
Further emphasizing on my point of views, some countries spend way too much on their few special players but still end up with empty palms when it comes to some big competitions. To be specific, England cricket team is inventor of the spectacular game called cricket but still they have not been lucky enough to bag any world cup trophy. It might hashappened due to unfair selection of players
In my notion, crores of amazingly talented players are forced to sit at home doing nothing due to unfair selection of players by their nation. I strongly believe that instead of sticking to same players, government or sporting authority should step up and give chances to talented ordinary people too so that they might change their and nations fortunate in big sporting events
To recapitulate, any sport is all about specific skills not the quotas. Players ought to be selected on behalf of their performance not on account of which family they belong to

Votes
Average: 7.9 (4 votes)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task II - IELTS Academic

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Countries
... way to bring any country in limelight. countries have been tend to spend money in bulk o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
...untry in limelight. countries have been tend to spend money in bulk on few best play...
^^^^
Line 1, column 391, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...well has sparked a heated debate. Here, i would like to swayed by the given state...
^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...ly but made some mind blowing records. Further emphasizing on my point of views, some ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pened due to unfair selection of players In my notion, crores of amazingly talent...
^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'well', 'while', 'for instance', 'in addition']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.26409495549 0.247107183377 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.175074183976 0.155533422707 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0979228486647 0.0946595960268 103% => OK
Adverbs: 0.053412462908 0.0501214627716 107% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0504451038576 0.0437548338989 115% => OK
Prepositions: 0.109792284866 0.122226691241 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0652818991098 0.0403226058552 162% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.64022415198 2.80594681477 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0563798219585 0.0326793684256 173% => OK
Particles: 0.00890207715134 0.00163938923432 543% => OK
Determiners: 0.0563798219585 0.0861772015684 65% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.026706231454 0.021408717616 125% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00890207715134 0.011925033212 75% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1886.0 1933.35771543 98% => OK
No of words: 315.0 316.048096192 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9873015873 6.12580529183 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20517956788 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.377777777778 0.374742101984 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.279365079365 0.28420135186 98% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.171428571429 0.203846283523 84% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.104761904762 0.137316102897 76% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64022415198 2.80594681477 94% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.037074148 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.56093040696 103% => OK
Word variations: 63.1573570542 60.7387585426 104% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0891783567 81% => OK
Sentence length: 24.2307692308 20.7743622355 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1105862704 49.517814964 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.076923077 127.492653851 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2307692308 20.7743622355 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.692307692308 0.814263465372 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.99599198397 125% => OK
Readability: 52.1672771673 49.1944974215 106% => OK
Elegance: 1.57446808511 1.69124875643 93% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219611827555 0.332605444948 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0887460417889 0.102741220458 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0552095248635 0.0668466124924 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.52329183439 0.534860350844 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.153561050872 0.148594505496 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922040659853 0.134430193775 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722018592435 0.0742795772207 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.241555108222 0.324371583561 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.028660442064 0.0638462369009 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135599826324 0.228012699653 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588402386519 0.058150111329 101% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.68436873747 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.4468937876 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.