Many developing countries require aid from international organisations to develop. Many people think that this aid should be financial, while others think that practical aid and advice are more useful. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is often argue that, getting financial support for the growth and development of a developing countries is more powerful than the advice and manpower aid from the worldwide organisation. Although, practical care and psychological supports are beneficial to the countries, I believe, financial aid is more beneficial.
To begin with, poor economical development, unemployment and poverty is the main problem of an under developed countries. Such problem lead to the financial crisis which would be subside by the help of international organisation. For example, UNESCO,UNICEF, and United nations are giving plenty of loans and banking support for the education, agriculture, travel and tourism development of a poor countries. Furthermore, many developing countries receiving such support from this organisations for giving subsidy or stipend of their nationality.
With regards to the practical and psychological aids are useful when the nations growth becoming consequently falling down to earth by the uneducated politician or financial adviser's misleading. Otherwise, every nations can handle the problem arise within the country by the good esteemed leaders. Nevertheless, receiving new possibilities, and facilities would help the nations economy to the international level.
In conclusion, overcome the problems inside the developing countries by the peaceful hand and intellectual way of the citizens, whereas, poverty or financial crisis would diminish the overall development. So that, banking support is more virtue of a nations can receive from the worldwide organisations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...more beneficial. To begin with, poor economical development, unemployment and poverty i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , UNICEF
...tional organisation. For example, UNESCO,UNICEF, and United nations are giving plenty o...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'country'?
Suggestion: country
...ravel and tourism development of a poor countries. Furthermore, many developing countries...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...g countries receiving such support from this organisations for giving subsidy or sti...
^^^^
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... psychological aids are useful when the nations growth becoming consequently falling do...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...bilities, and facilities would help the nations economy to the international level. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll development. So that, banking support is more virtue of a nations can receive ...
^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a nation' or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: a nation; nations
...hat, banking support is more virtue of a nations can receive from the worldwide organisa...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, nevertheless, so, whereas, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 231.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.91341991342 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32221116293 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5670995671 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0808187981 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.181818182 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.63636363636 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221969757621 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842095155149 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067736711141 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133988702654 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668593240026 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.