Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
It is true that a variety of historical places are predominantly visited by people from parts of the world, rather than local inhabitants. There are many reasons for this, but this situation should be addressed by attracting locals in some practical ways.
There are several reasons why the museums and historical sites do not attract the local people's attention. Firstly, the objects which are displayed in the museums are too familiar with residents. As a result, they only stimulate interest in tourist, whereas they slightly affect local inhabitants. In stead of visiting historical sites, people usually choose to go other places such as entertainment center, resorts. Secondly, entrance tickets are too high and not suitable for people's income. For instance, the cost of tickets is usually from 3 dollars while the average revenue is only about 250 dollars. Therefore, it is rather hard for local people to visit museums because they must make ends meet.
The government should take some measures to tackle this issue effectively. On the one hand, the obvious solution is for the manager to refresh the exhibits. Therefore, inhabitants will pay more visit to museums. On the other hand, the government provides support of the museum such that historical relic is free for all the local people. By doing this, residents will pay more visit sites in order to broaden their knowledge about their hometowns.
In conclusion, there are some known reasons for this trend. However, something should be done by the authorities to attract more visitors from the local area.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...storical sites do not attract the local peoples attention. Firstly, the objects which a...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 299, Rule ID: IN_STEAD_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Instead of'?
Suggestion: Instead of
...they slightly affect local inhabitants. In stead of visiting historical sites, people usual...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16862745098 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61940823473 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56862745098 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.8239697194 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.375 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9375 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9375 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405208687455 0.244688304435 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120492487066 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0900923262361 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244201665161 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549089263322 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.