Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Some museums around the world charge entrance fees while other are free to visit. It has both the benefit and the drawbacks, however, advantages are greater than disadvantages.
Payment while entering a museum could be a financial burden on poor citizen. As in this modern, earning for livehood is a struggle for many individuals, so paying charges for visiting a museum look injustice with them. For instance, a man from lower class family would not be able to show his children the cultural heritage in the museums. Keeping in view these facts, some rules and regulation favouring these people is needed. One possible solution is the introduction of a filter that would differentiate among the different classes of individuals, and would grant free entry to poor people.
On the contrary, the beneficial effects of this act outweigh the negative impacts and are worth mentioning. Firstly, the income generated by charging visitors could be used for various purposes. For example, it can be donated as charity to needy people or organization; in addition, can be used for the maintenance of the museum. Secondly, it would prevent uninterested from entering just for time pass. Thirdly, it would reduce overcrowding, so would decrease the chances of accidents. Finally, as it is easy for a thief to steal an antique when the place is densely populated, so its chances would be dropped to a greater extent, keeping eyes on few people is much more easier than a huge crowd.
In conclusion, although entrance tickets to a museum is a burden on poor families. However, overall outcome of this implementation is fruitful for both the society and the museum.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 668, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...ent, keeping eyes on few people is much more easier than a huge crowd. In conclusion, alt...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'while', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.239482200647 0.247107183377 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.139158576052 0.155533422707 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.100323624595 0.0946595960268 106% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0388349514563 0.0501214627716 77% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0258899676375 0.0437548338989 59% => OK
Prepositions: 0.132686084142 0.122226691241 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0517799352751 0.0403226058552 128% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.83993202675 2.80594681477 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0226537216828 0.0326793684256 69% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.119741100324 0.0861772015684 139% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0355987055016 0.021408717616 166% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00647249190939 0.011925033212 54% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1657.0 1933.35771543 86% => OK
No of words: 274.0 316.048096192 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.04744525547 6.12580529183 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20517956788 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.386861313869 0.374742101984 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.317518248175 0.28420135186 112% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.204379562044 0.203846283523 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.105839416058 0.137316102897 77% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83993202675 2.80594681477 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.037074148 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591240875912 0.56093040696 105% => OK
Word variations: 62.7177074978 60.7387585426 103% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0891783567 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.2666666667 20.7743622355 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4644127436 49.517814964 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.466666667 127.492653851 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.7743622355 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.13333333333 0.814263465372 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 50.0184914842 49.1944974215 102% => OK
Elegance: 2.07936507937 1.69124875643 123% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322027672966 0.332605444948 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0931555730594 0.102741220458 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0532399998625 0.0668466124924 80% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.495196999562 0.534860350844 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.138830918153 0.148594505496 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124341471311 0.134430193775 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641200853894 0.0742795772207 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.293749459233 0.324371583561 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.107778196612 0.0638462369009 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217504083941 0.228012699653 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459597650238 0.058150111329 79% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.68436873747 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 5.90881763527 85% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.5751503006 155% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.4468937876 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.