Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films.
Why could this be?
Should governments give more financial support to local film industries?
Nowadays, it is common knowledge that foreign films are holding more appeal to the audience than are domestically produced ones. Some people believe there do seem to be legitimate reasons for this phenomenon and I personally support the idea that more fund injection should be made by the government to the film industries.
To begin with, people tend to find overseas films more enjoyable than those produced locally for a number of reasons. Firstly, it is undoubted that advanced technology and innovation in some developed countries allow filmmakers to choose the best equipment and techniques available for the completion of a film. Meanwhile, in some developing countries, filmmakers remain rather inexperienced and there also exists a lack of necessary technologies, posing a challenge for the filmmaking industry. Secondly, the worldwide success of several blockblusters starring famous actors and actresses has made a huge impression on the audience, which step by step leads to a general consensus that foreign films are always superior to domestic ones.
As foreign films have entered and are capturing the domestic market, governments should stimulate the local film industries by offering financial assistance. Investing in this area would be an effective way to not only provide the audience with more movies of high quality but also promote the national cultures to both younger generations and international friends. Additionally, such movement could offer amateur or inexperienced filmmakers more opportunities to get access to state-of-the-art equipment and thereby develop their professional competence since the shortage of capital and investment has long been a thorny problem for them.
In conclusion, many people choose to watch foreign movies for the belief that their quality outweighs that of local ones. However, the situation could be mitigated should governments take appropriate measures to support the domestic film industries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 665, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'consensus'.
Suggestion: consensus
...audience, which step by step leads to a general consensus that foreign films are always superior ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, while, as for, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65202702703 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05399239055 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608108108108 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.7376588788 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.090909091 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9090909091 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.18181818182 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393839592812 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148138200167 0.084324248473 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10127934409 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25043171239 0.151304729494 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649001672513 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.