Nowadays many women are joining the police and military forces. however, some people believe that these jobs are not suitable for women discussed. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In the 21st century, women are contributing same as men in all sectors, even in military and police forces. Nevertheless, some traditionalists claim that the women are not capable of justifying the role of police officers or military commander. To my mind, in spite of this view, women are successful in fulfilling the basic need of aforementioned role up to an extent. Not just this, but adequate level of training and physical tests can mitigate the negative aspect of - women for these roles - wholly.
First of all, as the government is offering an equal opportunity to both genders on the basis of their qualification, abilities, and skills, the field of military service is not, even, substituted from it. Eventually by acquiring effective grades and passing all physical tests women becoming eligible to work as the police officer. Not just this, but in some community such as Islamic region, men are strictly prohibited to touch women. So in this case, women's entry as police officer play an indispensable role in handling female-offended crimes. As a result, women are given an opportunity and they have justified it very well, till today.
On the other hand, women are not physically fit with compared to their male counterparts. Additionally, sometimes they cannot deal effectively with drug dealers, escaped prisoners or criminals - which are often physically heavier and body builders - due to their physical weaknesses. Alongside women are more emotionally attached with any circumstances compared to men, as the research borne out by the Poland women's club.So, occasionally, they -women- cannot cope with horrifying accidents or murders, effectively. Seen in this life, certain situations and research results prove that women are not appropriate for police officer's role.
On a practical note, I suggest that rather than overlooking women's abilities, the government can introduce test which evaluates the physical and mental strength of every candidate - who applied for these roles. In which, women are not given any kind of liberty, without being said. Then after, an adequate level of training to this filtered candidates, especially women, make them perfectly suitable for the role of police or armed officers.
In a nutshell, albeit woman has some by birth backlashes such as physical weaknesses and soft mental approach, it is our - society and governments - responsibilities to provide equal exposure to them as same as men. In future, my aforementioned training approach may substitute all drawbacks with positive promotions ,especially in cases women.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rces. Nevertheless, some traditionalists claim that the women are not capable of ...
^^
Line 5, column 423, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...rch borne out by the Poland womens club.So, occasionally, they -women- cannot cope...
^^
Line 9, column 217, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the future'?
Suggestion: In the future
... equal exposure to them as same as men. In future, my aforementioned training approach ma...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 317, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e all drawbacks with positive promotions ,especially in cases women.
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'then', 'well', 'kind of', 'such as', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'in spite of', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.252676659529 0.247107183377 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.122055674518 0.155533422707 78% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0920770877944 0.0946595960268 97% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0792291220557 0.0501214627716 158% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0321199143469 0.0437548338989 73% => OK
Prepositions: 0.126338329764 0.122226691241 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0449678800857 0.0403226058552 112% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.03873755333 2.80594681477 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0235546038544 0.0326793684256 72% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0877944325482 0.0861772015684 102% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0107066381156 0.021408717616 50% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00856531049251 0.011925033212 72% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2587.0 1933.35771543 134% => OK
No of words: 411.0 316.048096192 130% => OK
Chars per words: 6.29440389294 6.12580529183 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.20517956788 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.369829683698 0.374742101984 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.30900243309 0.28420135186 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.250608272506 0.203846283523 123% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.150851581509 0.137316102897 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03873755333 2.80594681477 108% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.037074148 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569343065693 0.56093040696 101% => OK
Word variations: 67.2734296245 60.7387585426 111% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0891783567 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.8333333333 20.7743622355 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2146399141 49.517814964 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.722222222 127.492653851 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7743622355 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.833333333333 0.814263465372 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.99599198397 100% => OK
Readability: 53.7335766423 49.1944974215 109% => OK
Elegance: 1.81651376147 1.69124875643 107% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301913756644 0.332605444948 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.104391513356 0.102741220458 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0477975842832 0.0668466124924 72% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.531501806711 0.534860350844 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.104215659828 0.148594505496 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127175665878 0.134430193775 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058918839303 0.0742795772207 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.275327131526 0.324371583561 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.138767596713 0.0638462369009 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197189712902 0.228012699653 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660375632967 0.058150111329 114% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.68436873747 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 5.90881763527 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.5751503006 116% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.4468937876 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.