Nowadays modern gadgets are widely used by young people and the use of these products reduces their creativity.
Do you agree or disagree?
There is an ever increasing demand of technology in today’s generation. A commonly held belief is that the use of these contemporary devices curtails the child’s ingenuity. This essay totally agrees with this argument because it restricts the kid’s talent and become more reliant to these gadgets.
The main reason why I firmly believe that use of these advanced tools, such as laptops and tablets, restrict the child’s creative skills is because of the art programs installed already in these machines. The children can now easily access these applications by just following the simple instructions provided on the screen. As well as, they will only think less when they encountered any problems because the solutions are readily available in just one touch. To illustrate, some stories on the media highlighted that parents who give their kid a computer is less likely to learn new things and may slow down brain activity.
Another reason why I agree is reliance to these contemporary devices. Many parents use these gadgets, and are use repeatedly, in order to pacify the needs of their child. This may develop to obsession and may cause negative effects to kid’s well-being. One prime example of this, a well-known medical magazine featured an article stating that over-indulgence to the use of computers may possibly deteriorate toddlers’ brain function and development.
In conclusion, use of modern tools may provide harmful outcome to children’s over all well-being because it limits the child’s productivity and become dependent on this. Given this situation, parents must learn how to nurture their child properly by giving them items that may enhance their minds and become productive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 389, Rule ID: MIGHT_PERHAPS[1]
Message: Use simply 'may', 'possibly'.
Suggestion: may; possibly
...over-indulgence to the use of computers may possibly deteriorate toddlers' brain functi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 389, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'may'.
Suggestion: may
...over-indulgence to the use of computers may possibly deteriorate toddlers' brain functi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45018450185 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98146761057 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634686346863 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1771581451 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.615384615 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07692307692 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167740226852 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664880898503 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613123033229 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110437119817 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273911311066 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.