Nowadays people research their family history, some people say this is useless and we should instead focus on present and future generations. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
A curiosity about one’s past is always been people’s gene. While the family history can tell useful information about the medical conditions or habitual effects, current and future circumstances are more important than the past, because the current situation is different from the past to be based on. While I understand that presents are more important because historical gene issues can be prevented and cured by regular check up by modern technologies, the history of family tells necessary information about the critical conditions or specific behaviours that people may not aware about. So, people can make adjustment in their behavioural acts in this present phenomenon which could affect the future.
To know about the past is from genetic curiosity. Even children get curios about their ancestors. From the past history of one’s family, can acknowledge about the family tradition as well as other important medical conditions. For example, Angelina Jolie found out about breast cancer that causing her grandmother to death, so she frequently check her health to prevent of potential cancer. If people did not know about the family history, they may not be able to prevent the historical diseases. Therefore, knowing about the family history is necessary because anyone can prevent potential diseases which were occurred within the family.
In contrast, many people would not care about the family history, because current and future circumstances are more important than the past. Since the society has changed into information age, people can gather all the information from just a click. This is different from the ancestor’s generation, because the new diseases are created or new issues are occurred every day. For instance, MERS, ZIKA and SARS are the new diseases that had not been occurred in the past history but in this 21st century and which cure and symptoms were more important than knowing of family histories. As a result of this, people are concentrating more with the current situation than the past.
Even though I understand the current situations are important because this can affect the lifestyles in the future, knowing about the past seems also vital. From the medical conditions, habitual cycles and the specific characteristics can be stuck with DNAs. Once people aware of the information, they can make amendment when they make a decision in a life. For instance, Bill Gates’ family were suffered from poor for a long period which were due to laziness, so he decided to become a rich by not being lazy and always trying to work for every minute. If he was unaware of the family history and family characteristics, he would never be able to realise his potentials which were hidden inside of his DNAs. Thus, I believe that knowing of family history is necessary in order to acknowledge of one’s full information.
In conclusion, currently we are facing different issues which have not been dealt in the past. Thus, knowing about the current and future seems important. However, acknowledge of the past is more important because one’s family history contains the full information about one’s self without taking a time to analyse in every aspects. This information can be useful to make a decision or to live in a lifestyle because people can change their behaviours by acknowledging the information and which can affect the foreseeable circumstances.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 682, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th the current situation than the past. Even though I understand the current sit...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'as a result', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.226624405705 0.247107183377 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.148969889065 0.155533422707 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.10618066561 0.0946595960268 112% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0459587955626 0.0501214627716 92% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0301109350238 0.0437548338989 69% => OK
Prepositions: 0.13470681458 0.122226691241 110% => OK
Participles: 0.041204437401 0.0403226058552 102% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.82297430224 2.80594681477 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0206022187005 0.0326793684256 63% => OK
Particles: 0.00316957210777 0.00163938923432 193% => OK
Determiners: 0.0919175911252 0.0861772015684 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.026941362916 0.021408717616 126% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0142630744849 0.011925033212 120% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3427.0 1933.35771543 177% => OK
No of words: 549.0 316.048096192 174% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.24225865209 6.12580529183 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84053189512 4.20517956788 115% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.393442622951 0.374742101984 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.291438979964 0.28420135186 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.194899817851 0.203846283523 96% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.149362477231 0.137316102897 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82297430224 2.80594681477 101% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.037074148 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426229508197 0.56093040696 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 49.7491901607 60.7387585426 82% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0891783567 155% => OK
Sentence length: 21.96 20.7743622355 106% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3028296121 49.517814964 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.08 127.492653851 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.96 20.7743622355 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.64 0.814263465372 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 51.1038979964 49.1944974215 104% => OK
Elegance: 1.78873239437 1.69124875643 106% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155941871847 0.332605444948 47% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.108203595384 0.102741220458 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0807889611302 0.0668466124924 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.497565671794 0.534860350844 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.133997548915 0.148594505496 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700265902947 0.134430193775 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423850797216 0.0742795772207 57% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.455580685282 0.324371583561 140% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0607981695134 0.0638462369009 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124153734885 0.228012699653 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302742764891 0.058150111329 52% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.68436873747 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.41683366733 263% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 9.0 5.90881763527 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.5751503006 155% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 1.9629258517 357% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 10.4468937876 191% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.