In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
People have different views with regard to the necessity of constructing new fast railway lines to connect cities. In my view, it depends on the country’s circumstances and surroundings. While the new train might be certainly practical and beneficial for some countries, it would be more preferable for others to upgrade their current mass transportation.
On the one hand, building of new railway lines for very fast trains would definitely have a positive impact on several countries in various ways. Firstly, the fast train could enormously reduce the travel time of many citizens who need to shift between cities. Secondly, it is obvious that when a country has fast railroad networks, it will positively affect the logistics, tourism and business. For example, the selling price of many products would be cheaper since a single locomotive could carry tones of crops, goods or liquid items. Finally, the fast railway system may lead to the prosperity of provincial towns and local villages, with the easy access to metropolises.
On the other hand, some nations may not suitable to establish new railway lines. Alternatively, the betterment of current public transit system would be more attractive spending. In fact, some regions are not feasible for railways, as there might be swamps or rocky mountains. Furthermore, some countries may have enough mass transit system to meet the whole country’s demands. Therefore, renovating and repairing the present system would be a great help to inhabitants.
In conclusion, I agree with the idea of building new fast train system for some nations and I also believe that spending money on improving existing public transportation would be far more beneficial for other countries.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in my view, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34909090909 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.940835885 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581818181818 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2402569096 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.071428571 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320652097657 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101972910656 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951210336162 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219372889511 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0956890850917 0.056905535591 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.