The professional workers such as doctors, nurses and teachers should be paid more than entertainment personalities. to what extent do you agree or disagree?
For many years, the distribution of country's wealth has been debated. Some have advocated giving highly qualified professions such as doctors and teachers high wages than actors or sportsmen. I completely agree with this notion for several reasons. Nowadays, movie stars and football players are gaining much popularity and receiving all the attention either from the public or the government. That is why they are paid high salaries compared to other people working in other jobs in the same community. That maybe due to the fact that these actors and sportsmen are considered as role models for many especially children. Nevertheless, the vast majority of people think these stars are over-rated since they have no essential role in the country's renaissance. Conversely, health and education are the cornerstone in any country's development and prosperity. Accordingly, people working in these fields should be paid salaries higher than other fringe jobs for several reasons. Firstly, health care professionals and teachers spend tremendous effort and long time to be highly qualified. Moreover, paying attention to these highly qualified jobs would encourage young generations to attain these prestigious jobs. For example, if doctors and teacher were paid high salaries, children would be encouraged to study hard to be qualified to attain these careers. Furthermore, health care professionals generally are more prone to occupational hazards since they are continuously exposed to infectious agents from the contact with their patients. Consequently, they should be well compensated with decent salaries. In conclusion, although entertainment may be an important aspect in our life, this does not justify paying people working in this field higher than other vital jobs. It is high time doctors and teacher were paid wages higher than actors or sports stars.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, consequently, conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60424028269 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03319381272 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575971731449 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6957318328 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.125 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6875 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4375 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159941032973 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524429733409 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473866158598 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159941032973 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.