The rising levels of congestion and air pollution found in most of the world cities can be attributed directly to the rapidly increasing number of private cars in use. In order to reverse this, decline in the quality of life in cities, attempts must be made to encourage people to use their cars less and public transports more. Discuss possible ways to encourage the use of public transport.
The traffic congestion is the recent rising issues, because the number of private vehicles is increased as the society develops. As society develops and economically stabled, the traffic congestion within the metropolitan areas is growing and which is becoming socially and environmentally problems around the world. Therefore, many countries have attempted several approaches to reduce the use of private cars in order to reduce the congestion. Unfortunately these approaches have failed, and the only option left for the government is seemed to be encouraging the use of public transportation by providing better services and facilities.
In the past, the traffic congestion was not the problem, because cars were the symbolization of riches. Cars were possessed by wealthy people since ordinary people suffered from poverty. However, the society develops to the place where all the households can possess at least one car and the traffic congestion becomes increasing issues.
As society develops, the number of cars is increasing and which results in major parts of areas become congested. Even though the number of cars possessed by each household is increasing, the quality of life is declining due to environmental damages. The fossil gases and toxic emissions released from each vehicle can cause massive destruction to the atmosphere, and which enlighten the concerns about the congestion and the use of private vehicles. Therefore, the reduction of private vehicle use became the primary issue to be tackled.
As well as the individuals, the governments and the world organisations such as WEO and UNEP have attempted several approaches to solve the world's congestion issues. Each country had imposed a huge tax on vehicle manufacturing companies and consumers, but it did not work according to the plan. Therefore, it appears that the only way to reduce the use of private vehicle would be the encouragement of public transportation.
In order to encourage the use of public transportation, there are several ways such as the installation of more public transportation lanes as well as the frequent public transportation schedules. However, the most effective and the basic approach that could satisfy passengers would be the improvement of the facilities. By installing the frequent public transports that arrive and depart at exact time, it can help people to plan their days without experiencing any delays.
Furthermore, the improvement public transportation facilities, more comfortable seats, faster speeds and direct routes can encourage more passengers. People may use their private cars because lack of seats and crowd at the public transportation. If the governments provide more seats and by implementing more public transportation running, can reduce the use of private vehicles. Therefore, the improvement of public transportation can discourage people to use of private vehicles.
In conclusion, the traffic congestion are the growing recent problems as the society develops. There are several approaches to reduce the traffic congestion problems, however, the most effective way would be the encouragement of public transportation usage. In order to encourage the use of public transportation, the government could improve the public transportation systems by increasing the frequent of systems and improvement of facilities by implementing more seats within each transport modes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 141, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...tempted several approaches to solve the worlds congestion issues. Each country had imp...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'at least', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.283950617284 0.247107183377 115% => OK
Verbs: 0.144620811287 0.155533422707 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.10582010582 0.0946595960268 112% => OK
Adverbs: 0.037037037037 0.0501214627716 74% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00881834215168 0.0437548338989 20% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.112874779541 0.122226691241 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0493827160494 0.0403226058552 122% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.22108544287 2.80594681477 115% => OK
Infinitives: 0.026455026455 0.0326793684256 81% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.119929453263 0.0861772015684 139% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.021164021164 0.021408717616 99% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00881834215168 0.011925033212 74% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3406.0 1933.35771543 176% => OK
No of words: 517.0 316.048096192 164% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.58800773694 6.12580529183 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.20517956788 113% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.446808510638 0.374742101984 119% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.350096711799 0.28420135186 123% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.245647969052 0.203846283523 121% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.197292069632 0.137316102897 144% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22108544287 2.80594681477 115% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.037074148 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.42166344294 0.56093040696 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.2632114803 60.7387585426 79% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0891783567 149% => OK
Sentence length: 21.5416666667 20.7743622355 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9442102257 49.517814964 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.916666667 127.492653851 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5416666667 20.7743622355 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.814263465372 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38877755511 159% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 56.5513378466 49.1944974215 115% => OK
Elegance: 2.34259259259 1.69124875643 139% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.520282121557 0.332605444948 156% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.149389207667 0.102741220458 145% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0949432888682 0.0668466124924 142% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.647483265103 0.534860350844 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.106504194871 0.148594505496 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.246736889073 0.134430193775 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0977186169077 0.0742795772207 132% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.514148225799 0.324371583561 159% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0242971983484 0.0638462369009 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.378138058549 0.228012699653 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764513901083 0.058150111329 131% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.68436873747 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.41683366733 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 13.0 5.90881763527 220% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 2.5751503006 233% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 1.9629258517 204% => OK
Total topic words: 23.0 10.4468937876 220% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.